Companies, Governments Removing BPA From Baby Products

March 16, 2009 10:30 AM
by findingDulcinea Staff
After months of conflicting advice, companies are taking steps to eliminate bisphenol A from baby products, while Congress has introduced legislation to prohibit it.

Different Sectors Addressing BPA

This week House and Senate members introduced bills to ban the use of bisphenol A in food and beverage containers.

Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass., one of the sponsors of the House bill, said, "The scientific evidence is mounting that BPA poses serious health risks, especially to children, and manufacturers and retailers have already started to pull items from their store shelves," Agence France-Presse reported.

But others aren't waiting for Congress to act. In the last several weeks, several players—states, companies, manufacturers, even a county—have tried to limit people's exposure to BPA, which has been linked to a variety of health issues. BPA is a substance used to make food containers and some reusable plastic bottles.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European Food Safety Authority have both said the amount of BPA used in making baby bottles, for example, is not harmful to infants.
Recently Suffolk County, N.Y., leaders took steps to ban BPA. According to the Scientific American blog, Suffolk County is holding a public hearing on March 16 before the county executive decides whether to sign the bill, the final step in making it a law.

A half-dozen baby bottle makers recently announced they would stop using BPA because attorney generals in several states had asked.

This past week, news came that chemical manufacturer Sunoco would only sell BPA to companies that guarantee that it "will not be used in food and water containers for children under 3," The Associated Press reported.

Sunoco's policy has been in effect since November, though it was just reported nationally on March 12. Representatives from the Philadelphia-based company said concerns from their investors, including a group of nuns, helped shape the policy.

Qwidget is loading...

Background: Conflicting warnings and reassurances confuse consumers

A report issued by the National Toxicology Program on September 3 says there is “some concern” that bisphenol A (BPA), a chemical used to make baby bottles and other plastic products, and used to seal cans of food, may cause developmental problems in infants and children.

The findings—originally released in April—are based on animal experiments, but the group of scientists says health effects on humans cannot be ruled out, reports the AP.

Michael Shelby, who directed the report, said it is too early to recommend changes in what consumers purchase, but that those concerned could buy BPA-free products.

"More research is clearly needed to understand exactly how these findings relate to human health and development," he said in a statement.

The group did scale back one of its original findings, saying that there is only “minimal concern” that BPA could cause early puberty in girls. Original findings listed “some concern” about early puberty.

The Food and Drug Administration said it would look to the report as it continues to review the chemical. In mid-August, the agency said the chemical, which can leach out into food and liquid, is safe at current exposure levels. reported on August 15 that the FDA had “concluded that an adequate margin of safety exists” with BPA when the chemical comes into contact with food, despite the fact that earlier reports linked BPA with cancer and other health problems.

August wasn’t the first time the FDA has tried to reassure consumers that current levels of BPA are safe, even as the National Toxicology Program, another government agency, said otherwise. The group first issued a warning about BPA in April, saying it may be harmful to young children and fetuses, and linking it to common health problems, including prostate and breast cancer, and early puberty.

Consumers and retailers took note. Large stores in Canada immediately began removing baby bottles made with BPA from the shelves.

As panic set in, the FDA issued a statement in May saying it was reviewing BPA, however, a “large body of evidence” suggested that products made with it are safe.

Analysis: So what’s a consumer to do?

With all the conflicting advice from government agencies, consumers may not know whether to use products conducting BPA or even how to avoid the products.

In April, University of Minnesota newspaper Minnesota Daily suggested being careful with plastics that contain BPA, but not overzealous. “We don’t suggest that everyone who owns a Nalgene bottle stampede to toss them in the recycling bin, but it’s always better to err on the side of caution. If yours is damaged, it may be time to retire it, and it would be wise to avoid putting it in the microwave or dishwasher where the heat could release toxins.”

For those worried about potential, if not confirmed, health problems associated with BPA in products, avoiding the chemical as much as possible may be the best option. After the National Toxicology Program’s original findings were released, The Washington Post published a piece on how to limit BPA exposure, including washing hard plastic bottles by hand, not in the dishwasher, eating more fresh or frozen foods to avoid the BPA found in canned food linings, and using polycarbonate plastic bottles for cold or room-temperature fluids only.

Reference: National Toxicology Program and FDA findings


Most Recent Beyond The Headlines