Ohio Elections Head Appeals to US Supreme Court in Registration Case
Ohio, one of this election's battleground states, has been embroiled in a court case involving the secretary of state and the state’s GOP.
On Tuesday, a federal appeals court in Cincinnati, “sided with the Ohio Republican Party and ordered [Secretary of State Jennifer] Brunner to set up a system that provides names of newly registered voters whose driver's license numbers or Social Security numbers don't match records in other government databases,” the Associated Press reported.
The county election boards must get the information so they can verify a voter’s eligibility, the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said.
Today, Brunner told the Columbus Dispatch that up to a third of the 600,000 voter registrations submitted this year have eligibility questions. She also appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Brunner told the paper the Republicans were tring to manipulate federal election laws in an attempt to “cause chaos” in the days before the election.
"In this case, what we have is one political party that's trying to drive a truck through a small, little hole to create an advantage by somehow either injecting fear into the process or to try to disqualify voters on bases that don't justify disqualification and that the law doesn't support," Brunner said.
GOP officials have said they want to investigate voter fraud possibilities. Jason Mauk, a party spokesman, told the Dispatch that they have also asked for "the names of voters who registered and immediately cast a ballot between Sept. 30 and Oct. 6."
As The New York Times reported on Wednesday, however, tens of thousands of voters “have been removed from the rolls or have been blocked from registering,” many through questionably legal measures.
Notably, many of these measures are being implemented in potentially pivotal swing states, such as Ohio, Indiana and Michigan.
While there has been a concerted effort to rid the rolls of ineligible voters in accordance with the Help America Vote Act of 2002, The New York Times reports that in some states, for every new voter added to the rolls in the past two months, two voters have been dropped from the rolls.
The Act required all states to compile comprehensive lists of eligible voters into a single database. Yet the voter registration databases, some designed by companies that build electronic voting machines, aren’t federally tested, and “some have been plagued by missed deadlines, rushed production schedules, cost overruns, security problems, and design and reliability issues,” according to Wired magazine.
Due to the large number of voters dropped, many will not be notified of their removal until Election Day, long after they might have been able to do anything about it.
According to The New York Times study, Michigan and Colorado saw thousands of names dropped from the rolls in recent weeks, even though federal law forbids their removal within 90 days of a national election, except in cases of death, notification of relocation out of state or if they are deemed officially unfit to vote.
A closer look at the two states showed that those names purged from the rolls since Aug. 1 far exceeded the number of residents who had died or relocated out of the states.
Meanwhile, Indiana, North Carolina, Nevada and Ohio have improperly used social security numbers to verify registrations, a method that, under federal law, is intended to be a last resort.
This method flags those registrations that do not match up with the social security rolls. In Ohio, the state’s Republican Party has filed a motion to require that any voter who has been flagged must clear up the discrepancy or vote using a provisional ballot.
These large numbers have given the Democrats the most to gain from spikes in new voters but also made them the target of allegations of fraud and misrepresentation.
Critics have focused much of their energy at organizations focused on voter registration, such as ACORN, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now. ACORN has been accused in Nevada and Ohio of submitting questionable registrations.
Active investigations into ACORN, including their use of outside entities to collect voter registrations, resulted in a raid of their Nevada office earlier this week.
“Just as voting machines were the major issue that came out of the 2000 presidential election and provisional ballots were the big issue from 2004, voter registration and these statewide lists will be the top concern this year," Daniel P. Tokaji, a law professor at Ohio State University, told the Associated Press.
Last month saw a number of legal challenges involved in registration efforts in Ohio, Florida and Michigan, including efforts to inappropriately remove voters from the rolls before Election Day.
In Michigan, the campaign of Democratic candidate Barack Obama filed an injunction against the use of foreclosure lists to challenge voters’ residence of record in a method referred to as “caging.”
The accusation came after a GOP official in Michigan allegedly said that Republican representatives would be at every polling place with a list of foreclosed home owners, a quote he later denied making and has resulted in threats of a libel suit.
In several states, Election Day registrations have been challenged, though Ohio has seen an especially large number of legal arguments against the practice, as well as arguments against early or absentee voting without providing a reason to the state.
In 2005, the Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill allowing voters to submit absentee ballots without providing a reason. The law is now being challenged by the state’s Republican Party, who alleged that it violates an existing state law requiring that voters be registered for at least 30 days before they can vote.
Can I Vote? allows you to perform searches according to state, county and address to make sure you’re registered, and lets you search for your polling place.