Courts in L.A. Will Perform Gay Marriages on June 16
May 21, 2008 11:24 AM
by
Rachel Balik
The California Supreme Court ruled that it is illegal to ban gay marriage, and local courts are getting ready to perform such marriages when the ruling takes effect.
30-Second Summary
The California Supreme Court ruled earlier this month to overturn a state law that defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman. On June 16, the courthouse in Los Angeles County will begin performing gay marriages. "We expect that when the decision goes into effect, that there will be an initial peak in the volume of people coming into our office," said Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk Dean Logan. "We want to be sure we're prepared for that. We want to make sure we're staffed up for that."
Advocates of gay marriage feel that the court’s decision could be a turning point for gay marriage nationwide. “What happens in California, either way, will have a huge impact around the nation. It will set the tone,” said the executive director of Equality California, a gay rights group, prior to the ruling.
Although California already allowed for domestic partnerships between same-sex couples, the term marriage "has deep meaning for both sides of the case," says a lawyer for the city of San Franscisco.
Simultaneously, those opposed to gay marriage have petitioned for an amendment banning gay marriage that will appear on the ballot in November. The California legislature has tried to legalize gay marriage twice, but Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed the law each time, saying the decision should be left to voters or the court.
Advocates of gay marriage feel that the court’s decision could be a turning point for gay marriage nationwide. “What happens in California, either way, will have a huge impact around the nation. It will set the tone,” said the executive director of Equality California, a gay rights group, prior to the ruling.
Although California already allowed for domestic partnerships between same-sex couples, the term marriage "has deep meaning for both sides of the case," says a lawyer for the city of San Franscisco.
Simultaneously, those opposed to gay marriage have petitioned for an amendment banning gay marriage that will appear on the ballot in November. The California legislature has tried to legalize gay marriage twice, but Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed the law each time, saying the decision should be left to voters or the court.
Headline Link: Courts ramping up to perform same-sex marriages
The Los Angeles County courthouse is preparing to perform gay marriages starting on June 16, the first day it is legal. Acting Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk Dean Logan expects an influx of couples looking to get married on that day, and he is making arrangements to accomodate larger numbers of people. "We want to be sure we're prepared for that. We want to make sure we're staffed up for that," he said. The courthouse will also increase security and consider opening more marriage license offices.
Source: The Los Angeles Times
Background: ‘California Supreme Court overturns gay marriage ban’
The California Supreme Court overturned California's marriage laws in a 4-3 decision that stated that laws prohibiting same-sex marriages were unconstitutional. The ruling makes California the only state other than Massachusetts to legalize gay marriage. Gay marriage supporters are overjoyed. One father and partner in a same-sex relationship said, "I think this is the beginning of the end of ostracism, bullying, and all the things that used to make people feel less human than others." However, opponents of the ruling hope that it will be undone when an amendent banning gay marriage is put on the state ballot in November.
Source: The Los Angeles Times
In 2004, the mayor of San Francisco began issuing same-sex marriage licenses; lower courts declared them invalid, after which the California Supreme Court began examining the legality of gay marriage.
Source: Sign On San Diego
Opinion & Analysis: The ‘M’ word
The California Supreme Court had a hearing for arguments for and against gay marriage in March. “I think it's going to be a divided opinion but I wouldn’t want to predict who will win,” said lawyer Christopher Krueger. Gays in California already have the rights associated with marriage via domestic partnership laws, and one justice argued that it was an issue of semantics. San Francisco lawyer Therese Stewart said, “That symbol has deep meaning for both sides of the case.”
Source: Reuters
Reaction: Proposed California state constitutional amendment to ban marriage
In April, opponents of gay marriage appeared to have successfully collected enough signatures for a petition that will put a proposed state constitutional amendment banning gay marriage on the November ballot in California. If the court overturns the law defining marriage as between a union between man and a woman but does not legalize gay marriage and the ban passes in November, the court will no longer have the power to change gay marriage laws. Opponents are adamant that this should be a decision made by the people. “This shouldn't be something left to the court either now or in the future,” said Brian Brown, of the National Organization for Marriage.
Source: SF Gate
Historical Context: Same-sex marriage and civil unions in Massachusetts, New Jersey and Vermont
In 2003 the Boston Globe reported that, in a 4-3 ruling, the Supreme Court in Massachusetts had ordered the legalization of same-sex marriage. The majority ruling stated that Massachusetts “forbids the creation of second-class citizens."
Source: Boston Globe
New Jersey took a more moderate approach than Massachusetts in 2006, legalizing not marriage, but civil unions, for same-sex couples.
Source: Stateline.org
In 2000, Vermont became the first state to legalize civil unions between same-sex couples, although it refrained from allowing the unions to be called marriage.
Source: Time
Related Topic: Defining marriage in Virginia
In November 2006, voters in Virginia passed a constitutional amendment that made civil unions and domestic partnerships illegal and defined marriage as heterosexual institution. "Marriage has always been a unique institution specifically for a man and a woman," said Chris Freund, a spokesman for one of the groups that rallied for the amendment. Plenty of others come to court each year to dispute that distinction.






