Danish Muhammad Cartoon Republished
by
findingDulcinea Staff
Riots followed the publication of Danish cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad in 2005. An alleged plot to kill one of the cartoonist prompts 11 Danish newspapers to take action.
30-Second Summary
Three men were arrested Tuesday in the home city of Jyllands-Posten, the Danish newspaper that first printed the cartoons of the prophet. The New York Times writes that police said they acted “to prevent a terror-related assassination.”
The newspaper said there was a plot to kill the 73-year-old cartoonist who two years ago depicted Muhammad wearing a bomb instead of a turban. One of the most provocative images to appear in 2005, the cartoon was reprinted Wednesday by Jyllands-Posten and 10 other Danish newspapers, who said they were upholding the principle of free speech.
A similar argument prompted the original publication of the cartoons, which were commissioned in response to the perceived self-censorship in the West on the issue of relations with Islam.
At the time of the original publication, reactions were far from uniform. There were Muslims who condemned the violence and secularists who thought the cartoons were juvenile and needlessly offensive.
Some questioned the sincerity of the outrage in the Islamic world. The trouble didn’t flare until February 2006, although the pictures appeared in Jyllands-Posten in September 2005.
According to British geneticist and author of “The God Delusion” Richard Dawkins, a group of Muslims who had been living in Denmark toured Islamic countries, distributing copies of the pictures.
They supplemented the cartoons with three pictures that had never been meant to depict Muhammad. One was an Associated Press photo of a Frenchman wearing a pig’s nose competing in a “pig-squealing contest.”
It was only after these images and the original 12 had been circulated that the violence started.
Tuesday’s arrests may rekindle culture clashes in traditionally tolerant Denmark, The New York Times wrote Wednesday.
The newspaper said there was a plot to kill the 73-year-old cartoonist who two years ago depicted Muhammad wearing a bomb instead of a turban. One of the most provocative images to appear in 2005, the cartoon was reprinted Wednesday by Jyllands-Posten and 10 other Danish newspapers, who said they were upholding the principle of free speech.
A similar argument prompted the original publication of the cartoons, which were commissioned in response to the perceived self-censorship in the West on the issue of relations with Islam.
At the time of the original publication, reactions were far from uniform. There were Muslims who condemned the violence and secularists who thought the cartoons were juvenile and needlessly offensive.
Some questioned the sincerity of the outrage in the Islamic world. The trouble didn’t flare until February 2006, although the pictures appeared in Jyllands-Posten in September 2005.
According to British geneticist and author of “The God Delusion” Richard Dawkins, a group of Muslims who had been living in Denmark toured Islamic countries, distributing copies of the pictures.
They supplemented the cartoons with three pictures that had never been meant to depict Muhammad. One was an Associated Press photo of a Frenchman wearing a pig’s nose competing in a “pig-squealing contest.”
It was only after these images and the original 12 had been circulated that the violence started.
Tuesday’s arrests may rekindle culture clashes in traditionally tolerant Denmark, The New York Times wrote Wednesday.
Headline Links: Cartoon republished after arrests
Danish police arrested two Tunisians and a Dane for allegedly plotting to kill one of the 12 cartoonists whose caricatures of Muhammad provoked Muslim fury in 2006. The arrests were made in the Danish city of Aarhus, home to Jyllands-Posten, the newspaper that first printed the cartoons. Referring to the arrests, Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said that freedom of speech was under assault “by groups of extremists that do not accept and respect the basic principles on which the Danish democracy has been built.” A Muslim leader in Denmark stressed that the country’s Muslim community should not be made to pay for the misdeeds of a few.
Source: The New York Times
The arrests were made “to prevent a terror-related assassination.” Jyllands-Posten officials said the plotters wanted to kill their 73-year-old cartoonist whose caricature depicting Muhammad wearing a turban in the shape of a bomb with a lit fuse was among the most controversial images. Violent protests broke out across the Muslim world after several European publications republished the cartoons.
Source: International Herald Tribune
Following Tuesday’s arrest of three suspects in an alleged plot to kill a cartoonist whose work satirized the prophet Muhammad, several Danish newspapers reprinted one of the cartoons that sparked violent protests two years ago. The newspapers said they were upholding the principle of freedom of speech.
Source: The BBC
Background: The 2006 cartoon controversy
The inflammatory pictures originally “accompanied an editorial criticizing self-censorship after Danish writer Kare Bluitgen complained that he was unable to find an illustrator for his children's book about the prophet,” writes the BBC in a Q&A on the cartoons.
Source: The BBC
The cartoon controversy went global after an Egyptian newspaper reprinted some of the original 12 cartoons, calling them a “continuing insult” and a “racist bomb.” Diplomatic protests followed while gunmen attacked the EU’s offices in Gaza. After several European newspapers reprinted the cartoons, the protest spread throughout the Muslim world and turned violent.
Source: The BBC
Opinion & Analysis: The limits of free speech
The Danish cartoons played into the hands of religious leaders in Pakistan, and the supposedly spontaneous protests were a warning to Pakistan’s liberal leadership, said the BBC’s Aamer Ahmed Khan in 2006.
Source: The BBC
According to an excerpt from Richard Dawkins’ book “The God Delusion” quoted in a blog, a group of Danish Muslims deliberately incited Muslim fury by bringing the cartoons to the Muslim world’s attention, giving false and incendiary information about their origins, and adding to the original 12 images three that were particularly offensive, but actually had nothing to do with Denmark or the prophet.
Source: Brian Micklethwait
A 2006 op-ed in Reason Magazine asserted that the Danish cartoons were a “stunt” that was “unambiguously provocative, juvenile, offensive, and irresponsible. That's why it needs to be defended.” Reason concluded the debate that arose following the condemnation of the cartoons showed that in the battle for free speech, its defenders are winning.
Source: Reason Magazine
A piece in Iran Daily says that under cover of free speech, the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten defamed Islam, incited hatred of Muslims and their religion and actually abused freedom of speech.
Source: Iran Daily
Related Link: Iran retaliates
Iran displayed more than 200 Holocaust cartoons in a museum in retaliation for European newspapers’ printing of Muhammad cartoons. The BBC quoted the exhibition’s organizer as saying, “You see they allow the Prophet to be insulted. But when we talk about the Holocaust, they consider it so holy that they punish people for questioning it.”
Source: The BBC







