Breast-Feeding May Decrease Risk of Breast Cancer
August 28, 2008 11:56 AM
A Seattle study suggests that breast-feeding may diminish the risk of some aggressive types of breast cancer.
New Research Into Breast-Feeding and Cancer
Seattle’s Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center has found that breast-feeding for at least six months decreases the risk of contracting luminal cancer, and a type of cancer known as triple negative cancer, which is common among African Americans and Hispanics, especially in younger women. While the link between breast-feeding and reduced breast cancer risk isn’t new, the specific discovery of its effects on triple negative cancer is.
Triple negative cancer, a particularly aggressive form, was given its name because it is unaffected by the regulatory protein HER2, along with the hormones estrogen and progestin. Breast cancer researcher Dr. Funmi Olopade explained the significance of triple negative cancer, saying, “We don’t know the risk factors, we don’t know how to screen for it, and we don’t know how best to treat it.” This cancer type comprises about 15 to 30 percent of all breast cancers.
Triple negative cancer, a particularly aggressive form, was given its name because it is unaffected by the regulatory protein HER2, along with the hormones estrogen and progestin. Breast cancer researcher Dr. Funmi Olopade explained the significance of triple negative cancer, saying, “We don’t know the risk factors, we don’t know how to screen for it, and we don’t know how best to treat it.” This cancer type comprises about 15 to 30 percent of all breast cancers.
Amanda Phipps and her colleagues studied over 2,500 women, aged 55 to 79, roughly half of whom had cancer and half who didn’t. Researchers took the women’s reproductive histories, including their breastfeeding habits, start of menopause and age at which their menstrual cycle began.
Phipps proposed two theories: one explanation for the reduced risk is that a woman who is breast-feeding has stopped menstruating and her “hormones aren’t cycling”; a second possibility is that the cell structures in a woman’s breast change in such a way that they might be less capable of forming cancerous cells.
Phipps and her colleagues also showed that the late onset of menopause and the use of hormone treatment increase the chances of contracting luminal cancer.
Last year, The Washington Post expressed the concern of many researchers troubled by the question: “Why are black women, who are less likely to get the disease than white women, more likely to get it when they are young—and much more likely to die from it?” The finding that black women are more likely to get the most aggressive type of breast cancer, triple threat cancer, only partially answered their question. Now scientists are hoping to find out whether the causes are genetic or environmental.
Recent studies showed that 70 percent of cancer in black women in Nigeria and Senegal is triple threat cancer, which suggests a genetic basis. Yet Robert Millikan of the University of North Carolina, points out that black women are less likely than white women to breast-feed, implying that environmental factors are also involved.
Otis W. Brawley, an Emory oncologist, sees the discussion as moot: “Even if we find a great new treatment for triple-negative breast cancer tomorrow, I already have the data to show that a large proportion of black women aren’t going to get it.”
Phipps proposed two theories: one explanation for the reduced risk is that a woman who is breast-feeding has stopped menstruating and her “hormones aren’t cycling”; a second possibility is that the cell structures in a woman’s breast change in such a way that they might be less capable of forming cancerous cells.
Phipps and her colleagues also showed that the late onset of menopause and the use of hormone treatment increase the chances of contracting luminal cancer.
Last year, The Washington Post expressed the concern of many researchers troubled by the question: “Why are black women, who are less likely to get the disease than white women, more likely to get it when they are young—and much more likely to die from it?” The finding that black women are more likely to get the most aggressive type of breast cancer, triple threat cancer, only partially answered their question. Now scientists are hoping to find out whether the causes are genetic or environmental.
Recent studies showed that 70 percent of cancer in black women in Nigeria and Senegal is triple threat cancer, which suggests a genetic basis. Yet Robert Millikan of the University of North Carolina, points out that black women are less likely than white women to breast-feed, implying that environmental factors are also involved.
Otis W. Brawley, an Emory oncologist, sees the discussion as moot: “Even if we find a great new treatment for triple-negative breast cancer tomorrow, I already have the data to show that a large proportion of black women aren’t going to get it.”
Video: Triple negative breast cancer
Cheryl Reed, 40, an African-American mother of two children living in Atlanta, has triple negative breast cancer. According to CNN, “Women with triple negative breast cancer lack three hormone receptors known to fuel most breast cancer tumors, which means many of the most common drugs don’t work.”
Background: Risks for black and Hispanic women; triple negative breast cancer questions
In 2006, scientists discovered that a “basal-like” form of triple negative cancer was more prevalent among young black women, composing 39 percent of their cancers, compared with 16 percent in white women.
Source: The Washington Post: Drug-Resistant Breast Cancer Afflicts Blacks
The Mayo Clinic explains the luminal A and luminal B breast cancers: “The genetic activity of these cancers is similar to that of normal lumen cells—those that line the breast ducts and glands.” It’s a cancer that is slow growing and “estrogen-receptor positive,” meaning estrogen causes tumor growth.
Source: The Mayo Clinic
In mid July, George Sledge, M.D., and Beth Baughman DuPree, M.D., F.A.C.S., answered readers’ questions about triple negative breast cancer. Asked about genetic versus environmental causes, Dr. Sledge explained that scientists still don’t have a satisfactory answer. He added, “The only genetic factor we have identified so far for triple-negative breast cancers (and only in a small percentage) is the BRCA1 mutation.” (According to CNN, BRCA1 is a cancer-causing gene that was found nearly 15 years ago.)
Source: Breast Cancer.org
Related Topics: Survivor advice; self-exams debated; physical activity and risk
Reona Barry, diagnosed with breast cancer at 38, formed a discussion group for African-American breast cancer survivors. She advises new patients to “[g]o to the doctor with someone that will help you listen. When the doctor is talking we only hear about half what they’re saying … Ask all the questions you need.”
Source: NIH
Researchers say that self-exams, though commonly recommended as a screening tool, may not save women’s lives, and may even do more harm than good.
Source: findingDulcinea
According to Science Daily, “Lean women who play sport or undertake other physically active things in their spare time especially if they have been through menopause, have the lowest risk of breast cancer.”







