Rajesh Kumar Singh/AP
Is Organic Farming a Rotten Idea?
July 09, 2008 07:00 AM
by
findingDulcinea Staff
India’s farmers are shying away from modern methods, but critics doubt organic farming’s helpfulness and say food shortages necessitate use of technology to increase yield.
30-Second Summary
Only a tiny fraction—5 percent—of Indian farmers have gone organic, according to US News & World Report. But even modest growth in the sector could have a huge impact on the country’s agricultural industry, at a time of heightened concern over the world’s food supply.
In 1965, the so-called Green Revolution popularized modern farming methods, including the use of fertilizers and pesticides, and helped to alleviate mass hunger in India. But some now say that they are suffering the ill effects, with rampant chemical pollution and cancer and other diseases becoming a growing concern.
“People are fed up with chemical farming,” said Amarjit Sharma to U.S. News & World Report, who began organic farming four years ago. “The Earth is now addicted to the use of these chemicals.”
But the environmental effectiveness of organic farming is still under debate. And the Economist calls the practice “bad news for the poor,” asserting that it yields smaller crops than modern methods.
The New Republic, in a recent blog posting, contests the Economist’s claim, arguing that organic farming’s yield can be equal to or greater than that of industrialized farms: “It’s a model for a more energy-efficient, less toxic form of farming that can, at its best, improve crop yields for farmers in poor countries as well as rich ones. At the same time, it’s only one among many alternative farming practices that a food-strapped country should be considering.”
In 1965, the so-called Green Revolution popularized modern farming methods, including the use of fertilizers and pesticides, and helped to alleviate mass hunger in India. But some now say that they are suffering the ill effects, with rampant chemical pollution and cancer and other diseases becoming a growing concern.
“People are fed up with chemical farming,” said Amarjit Sharma to U.S. News & World Report, who began organic farming four years ago. “The Earth is now addicted to the use of these chemicals.”
But the environmental effectiveness of organic farming is still under debate. And the Economist calls the practice “bad news for the poor,” asserting that it yields smaller crops than modern methods.
The New Republic, in a recent blog posting, contests the Economist’s claim, arguing that organic farming’s yield can be equal to or greater than that of industrialized farms: “It’s a model for a more energy-efficient, less toxic form of farming that can, at its best, improve crop yields for farmers in poor countries as well as rich ones. At the same time, it’s only one among many alternative farming practices that a food-strapped country should be considering.”
Headline Link: ‘The Toxic Consequences of the Green Revolution’
Farmers say that the rising costs of seed, fertilizer and pesticides is part of their new interest in organic farming. But they also cite environmental and health reasons, such as concern that chemical use is ruining the soil and polluting drinking water, and the growing incidence of cancer and other diseases.
Source: U.S. News & World Report
Opinion & Analysis: Organic vs. modern farming
The Economist claims that organic farms require more land to produce the same amount of crop. It predicts that, as the global food crisis continues, environmentalists will have an increasingly difficult time promoting organic farming methods.
Source: The Economist
Joanna Pearlstein at Wired reports that organic goods are not necessarily better for the environment than the products of conventional agriculture: “Because while there may be sound health reasons to avoid eating pesticide-laden food, and perhaps personal arguments for favoring the organic-farmers’ collective, the truth is that when it comes to greenhouse gases, organics can be part of the problem.”
Source: Wired
The New Republic argues that organic farming can help the industrialized world increase global food production, lower food prices, and feed poor countries.
Source: The New Republic
World food shortages and climate change can be best addressed by organic solutions, said the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements at a meeting of the Organic World Congress in June. The group criticized a recent UN food summit for promoting chemical fertilizers and genetically modified crops rather than organic solutions to world hunger.
Source: Reuters
Reference: Organic food
Harness the Internet’s resources to learn more about organic foods, along with local, fair trade and sustainable products, with the help of findingDulcinea’s Web Guide to Socially Responsible Food.
Source: findingDulcinea
Related Topics: ‘Is Local Food Really More Environmentally Friendly?’
While debate continues over the efficacy of organic farming, another controversy is growing over local foods. Environmentalists claim that eating locally grown foods is more Earth-friendly, but critics say that hidden carbon costs give some local food bigger environmental footprints than industrialized farm products.






