Nabokov’s Son to Sell Author’s Last Work
30-Second Summary
Vladimir Nabokov’s last novel, “The Original of Laura,” has allegedly plagued his son for the past 30 years, as his perfectionist father had asked him to destroy the unfinished book after his death.
The novel has been sitting in a Swiss bank vault all this time.
But Slate’s Ron Rosenbaum, who has been following the story, wrote this week that Dmitri had a change of heart during an imagined conversation with his father's ghost.
Vladimir Nabokov, with a “wry and fond smile,” told his son, “say or do what you like but why not make some money on the damn thing?”
Thus, Dmitri decided that selling the novel is not a betrayal of his father’s wishes after all.
Whether the critics and Nabokov's readership will be as sanguine is another matter.
Kathryn Hughes writes on The Guardian blog that “the writer in me is horrified at the thought of someone publishing something that isn't ready to be seen.”
But in Nabokov’s case, she wonders if the “trickiest literary jester who ever lived” really meant it. And, if he did, why didn’t he make sure the book was destroyed before he died?
Natalie Haynes contends in the Times of London that even if Nabokov’s dying wish isn’t realized, it will not make or break an already stellar reputation.
“After all, what difference could it possibly make to Nabokov's reputation if his final work is fragmentary or not especially great? He's Nabokov,” she writes.
Headline Link: 'The Fate of Nabokov's Laura, Part II'
Ron Rosenbaum follows the story of Dmitri Nabokov as he decides whether or not to burn his father’s last work. He follows up his first story on Slate with an update on the younger Nabokov's decision to sell the novel after an imagined conversation with his dead father, “Lolita” author Vladimir Nabokov.
Source: Slate
Opinion & Analysis: Vladimir Nabokov wouldn't mind
“If it were anyone else but Vladimir Nabokov, I'd suggest doing the decent, respectful thing and letting 'The Original of Laura' go up in smoke. But given that we're talking about the trickiest literary jester who ever lived, I think we can assume that the whole thing is a kind of Nabokovian practical joke from beyond the grave,” Kathryn Hughes writes in a blog post for The Guardian.
Source: The Guardian
Natalie Haynes of the Times of London wonders why it took Dmitri Nabakov 30 years to decide whether to burn his father’s final, unpublished work. Haynes writes that Dmitri should not be so tied to his father’s advice and should take the “pragmatic view” that “neither authors nor parents are always right, about their offspring or anything else.”
Source: The Times of London
Related Topics: Other posthumously published fathers
Source: January Magazine
Source: The BBC
Background: When he was undecided
Source: Slate







