How Does $300 Billion Vanish?
May 17, 2008 5:30 AM
by
findingDulcinea Staff
Several major financial institutions recently endured massive write-downs of assets: some observers claim the culprit is fair value accounting.
30-Second Summary
How does $300 billion simply vanish? Many are asking this question after a steady flow of gargantuan write-downs by the world’s leading financial institutions.
Merrill Lynch, Citigroup, UBS and Deutsche Bank have stunned the finance world with recent massive write-downs. Jack Malvey, a research analyst at Lehman, tallied these global write-downs at $300 billion. The crisis ran so deep that J.P. Morgan was widely hailed because its write-downs were “only” $2 billion.
While a “write-down” does not represent an actual outflow of cash, it weakens a company’s financial position by reducing total assets. For a financial institution, this can be a death knell if it can no longer meet regulatory capital requirements, or if it loses the confidence of trading partners, as occurred with Bear Stearns.
Public companies have long been required to write down impaired assets on their balance sheet. However, the uptick in write-downs seems linked to the recently modified requirements of “fair value accounting,” instituted in the wake of the Enron scandal of 2001. With the market value of many financial assets declining, financial institutions operating under the 2007 guidelines are writing down the value of certain assets much further than they might have in years past. Observers now wonder if these requirements have benefited investors, or are instead exacerbating the current financial crisis.
Merrill Lynch, Citigroup, UBS and Deutsche Bank have stunned the finance world with recent massive write-downs. Jack Malvey, a research analyst at Lehman, tallied these global write-downs at $300 billion. The crisis ran so deep that J.P. Morgan was widely hailed because its write-downs were “only” $2 billion.
While a “write-down” does not represent an actual outflow of cash, it weakens a company’s financial position by reducing total assets. For a financial institution, this can be a death knell if it can no longer meet regulatory capital requirements, or if it loses the confidence of trading partners, as occurred with Bear Stearns.
Public companies have long been required to write down impaired assets on their balance sheet. However, the uptick in write-downs seems linked to the recently modified requirements of “fair value accounting,” instituted in the wake of the Enron scandal of 2001. With the market value of many financial assets declining, financial institutions operating under the 2007 guidelines are writing down the value of certain assets much further than they might have in years past. Observers now wonder if these requirements have benefited investors, or are instead exacerbating the current financial crisis.
Headline Links: Financial institutions report substantial write-downs
A number of large financial institutions reported write-downs in 2008, and UBS is currently leading the pack. Following in the wake of Merrill Lynch and Bear Stearns, UBS recently wrote down another $19 billion in troubled assets, bringing the company’s total to $37 billion.
Source: Baltimore Sun
Write-downs are approaching $300 billion, and may reach close to $400 billion by the end of 2008.
Source: MarketWatch
A Wall Street Journal blog praised J.P. Morgan for keeping write-downs to less than $2 billion.
Source: Deal Journal [Wall Street Journal]
Background: What is fair value accounting?
When a company writes down assets as a result of fair value accounting methods, the result is one that only affects its financial statements—there is no outflow of cash. The company is merely adjusting the value of its assets on the balance sheet and disclosing that the value of certain assets has decreased.
Source: AllBusiness.com
The Financial Accounting Standard Board’s (FASB) Fair Value Measurement accounting method became available in 2007 and was embraced immediately by financial institutions. The difficulties of applying this method, however, became evident this year, as described in the article below from Compliance Week.
Source: Compliance Week
Opinions & Analysis: Is fair value accounting worsening the financial crisis?
The Financial Times writes, “there is mounting concern that…[fair value accounting] creates distortions when markets are as dysfunctional as they are now. Indeed, some bankers fear that the system is actually making the crisis worse.”
Source: Financial Times
In an article titled “Is fair value accounting really fair?” Reuters questions whether there is an adequate balance between the need for investors to receive transparent information versus the potential harm that such vague disclosure requirements can do to these multi-billion dollar financial institutions and the markets they influence.
Source: Reuters
While some blame the financial institutions for being vague, others are going straight to the source and pointing to the accountants, or more specifically, the FASB, for requiring companies to mark their assets and liabilities to barely existent, and sometimes nonexistent, market data.
Source: Seeking Alpha
On the other hand, Willkie Farr & Gallagher partner Michael R. Young recently wrote, “We should be slow to blame the accountants or new accounting standards for the subprime meltdown. To the contrary, some may be expected to point out that the aftermath of the subprime difficulties has put to the test a financial reporting system that has responded as it should.”
Source: Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP Web site [PDF document]
Reactions: “Tips” from the SEC
The PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) does not plan to make changes to fair value accounting methods. Meanwhile, according to Reuters, the SEC is developing fair value ‘tips’ for certain companies that encounter the most difficulties with the rule.
Source: Reuters
Reference: The fair value accounting rule
The FASB publishes a summary of Statement No. 157: Fair Value Measurement, which determines the principles behind fair value accounting.
Source: Web site of the Financial Accounting Standards Board
Related Topics: Did Enron start this ball rolling?
In December 2001, Enron filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. With assets listed at $50 billion at the time, it was the largest collapse in American corporate history. The Washington Post provides an accurate and detailed timeline outlining the Enron collapse from early 2001 through 2004.
Source: Washington Post
After the downfall of Enron, Congress enacted the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, requiring greater scrutiny and disclosure from public companies. The SEC hosts the complete documentation of the Act in PDF format.
Source: Web site of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission [PDF document]
Eighteen months after Sarbanes-Oxley was voted into law, Ken Schroeder of MarketWatch argued that it “only serves to stifle economic growth.”
Source: MarketWatch
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act created the PCAOB, which polices independent, corporate auditors and seeks to ensure that they are employing appropriate methods when auditing public companies. In December 2007, the PCAOB responded to the challenges presented by the subprime credit situation and the large write-downs being reported by financial institutions. It issued an alert intended to assist auditors with interpreting FASB Statement No. 157 during current market conditions.




