Susan Walsh/AP
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, left, accompanied by Federal Reserve Board Chairman
Ben Bernanke
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, left, accompanied by Federal Reserve Board Chairman
Ben Bernanke
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Put Some Foreclosures on Hold
November 21, 2008 11:57 AM
by
Anne Szustek
The two mortgage giants announced Thursday the suspension of foreclosures of occupied homes from Nov. 26 to Jan. 9, buying time to help struggling borrowers.
Fannie, Freddie Halt Evictions for Holiday Season
The move to put a temporary injunction on foreclosures is to help an estimated 16,000 borrowers. Plus, it will give Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac more time to work out the details of its “streamlined modification” program to restructure payment plans, scheduled to get underway Dec. 15.
Fannie Mae CEO Herb Allison said in a statement, “We felt it was in the best interest of both borrowers and Fannie Mae to take this extra step to ensure that homeowners with the desire and ability to prevent a foreclosure have an opportunity to stay in their homes.”
The announcement that Fannie and Freddie would stop foreclosures comes a week after their regulator announced that borrowers whose mortgage payments account for more than 38 percent of income could have their monthly obligation reduced.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac account for about half of the country’s outstanding residential mortgages, thus making their sustainability quite important. Adding additional weight is that they are among the few major mortgage lenders left standing after the sub-prime crisis of the past two years—as well as the fact that they are largely interwoven with global markets.
The U.S. Treasury put the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (Freddie Mac) under a conservatorship controlled by the Federal Housing Finance Authority, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson announced in September.
“Our economy will not recover until the bulk of this housing correction is behind us. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are critical to turning the corner on housing,” Paulson was quoted as saying by The Washington Post.
Strictly speaking, a conservatorship means that one organization takes another organization under control for a temporary period of time with the goal of rehabilitating it to normal and then reliquishing control. But although the Treasury had capped both companies’ mortgage portfolios at $850 billion as of the end of 2009, The Wall Street Journal reports that the “Treasury’s move doesn’t answer the question of what ultimately happens to Fannie and Freddie.” That decision rests with Congress. Shares of both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are still to be traded on the New York Stock Exchange.
Before Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were taken under federal conservatorship, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson announced the evening of July 13 that he was asking Congress for speedy approval of authority for the federal government to provide financial support to Fannie and Freddie. A week earlier, rumors about the two companies’ insolvency cut the value of their shares nearly in half.
Fannie Mae CEO Herb Allison said in a statement, “We felt it was in the best interest of both borrowers and Fannie Mae to take this extra step to ensure that homeowners with the desire and ability to prevent a foreclosure have an opportunity to stay in their homes.”
The announcement that Fannie and Freddie would stop foreclosures comes a week after their regulator announced that borrowers whose mortgage payments account for more than 38 percent of income could have their monthly obligation reduced.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac account for about half of the country’s outstanding residential mortgages, thus making their sustainability quite important. Adding additional weight is that they are among the few major mortgage lenders left standing after the sub-prime crisis of the past two years—as well as the fact that they are largely interwoven with global markets.
The U.S. Treasury put the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (Freddie Mac) under a conservatorship controlled by the Federal Housing Finance Authority, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson announced in September.
“Our economy will not recover until the bulk of this housing correction is behind us. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are critical to turning the corner on housing,” Paulson was quoted as saying by The Washington Post.
Strictly speaking, a conservatorship means that one organization takes another organization under control for a temporary period of time with the goal of rehabilitating it to normal and then reliquishing control. But although the Treasury had capped both companies’ mortgage portfolios at $850 billion as of the end of 2009, The Wall Street Journal reports that the “Treasury’s move doesn’t answer the question of what ultimately happens to Fannie and Freddie.” That decision rests with Congress. Shares of both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are still to be traded on the New York Stock Exchange.
Before Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were taken under federal conservatorship, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson announced the evening of July 13 that he was asking Congress for speedy approval of authority for the federal government to provide financial support to Fannie and Freddie. A week earlier, rumors about the two companies’ insolvency cut the value of their shares nearly in half.
As government-sponsored entities (GSEs), the two companies had enjoyed an implied federal guarantee of their obligations, and thus investors have allowed the GSEs to carry far more debt than would be allowed by an entity without the implicit federal guarantee.
Steps have been taken on the local and state levels to keep struggling mortgage holders in their homes.
Atlanta and Fulton, DeKalb, Gwinnett, Clayton and Cobb counties, which together comprise much of the Atlanta metropolitan area is to receive $81 million in aid to stem foreclosures by way of the federal Neighborhood Stabilization Plan, reports the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
As of Oct. 13, Tom Dart, the sheriff of Cook County, Ill., where Chicago is located, was refusing to enforce any more evictions of county residents. Dart maintains that the eviction orders often name the wrong party, or that the mandated 120-day notice was not given to the tenants. The Accredited Home Lenders has filed a lawsuit to force the sheriff to enforce court-ordered evictions. Dart argues that in many cases, families who have consistently paid their rent have been forced from their homes because their landlord failed to pay the mortgage, although he acknowledges that his policy also protects nonpayers.
Steps have been taken on the local and state levels to keep struggling mortgage holders in their homes.
Atlanta and Fulton, DeKalb, Gwinnett, Clayton and Cobb counties, which together comprise much of the Atlanta metropolitan area is to receive $81 million in aid to stem foreclosures by way of the federal Neighborhood Stabilization Plan, reports the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
As of Oct. 13, Tom Dart, the sheriff of Cook County, Ill., where Chicago is located, was refusing to enforce any more evictions of county residents. Dart maintains that the eviction orders often name the wrong party, or that the mandated 120-day notice was not given to the tenants. The Accredited Home Lenders has filed a lawsuit to force the sheriff to enforce court-ordered evictions. Dart argues that in many cases, families who have consistently paid their rent have been forced from their homes because their landlord failed to pay the mortgage, although he acknowledges that his policy also protects nonpayers.
Background: The decline of the two state-sponsored mortgage lenders; July 13 announcement
Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway, a significant long-term investor in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, sold its entire position in both stocks in 2000. Seeking Alpha reports that, at the subsequent meeting of Berkshire Hathaway stockholders, Buffett explained the divestment of Freddie Mac stock this way: “We felt uncomfortable with certain aspects of the business as they developed. … We did not sell because we were worried about more governmental regulation—the opposite if anything. We felt the risk profile had changed.” Berkshire’s vice chairman, Charlie Munger, chimed in, “maybe it’s unique to us, but we’re quite sensitive to financial risks.”
Source: Seeking Alpha
In a rare weekend appearance, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson announced the evening of Sunday, July 13, that he was asking Congress for speedy approval of authority for the federal government to provide financial support to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Source: findingDulcinea
Reports of accounting malfeasance at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were dogging the two mortgage lenders. The Federal Reserve and members of the office of the federal comptroller had been examining Fannie and Freddie’s books for evidence of financial impropriety. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson's July 23 speech to Congress pleading for a government-backed bailout plan brought out a new wave of finger-pointing as to who or what was responsible for the lenders' struggles.
Source: findingDulcinea
Banking consultant Brent Ely said on NPR that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac “as of March 31, the two companies combined had over $500 billion of short-term debt outstanding. That’s a huge amount of money that they have to keep rolling over. It works out to, you know, an average of $40 [billion] or $50 billion a month.”
Source: NPR
In 1999, The New York Times reported on an initiative by Fannie Mae to reduce the downpayment requirements for many loans that it guarantees. Then-CEO Franklin Raines trumpted the beneficial effect on home ownership, but the Times noted that “Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue.”
Source: The New York Times
A report issued by the Office of Federal Housing Oversight in September 2004 gave Fannie Mae a “fanny kicking,” writes Slate’s David Gross. The agency’s findings showed accounting malfeasance. Gross wrote that this “Enron-in-the making” situation was spurred on in part by a system that rewarded Fannie executives for hitting certain numbers. Fannie CEO Franklin Raines had to testify in front of the House Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance and Government Sponsored Enterprises on Oct. 6, 2004, about the company.
Source: Slate
In November 2005, The Washington Post reported on the efforts of new Fannie Mae CEO Daniel Mudd to improve the Company’s culture and public image, and repair relations with its critics.
Source: The Washington Post
Due in part to extensive lobbying efforts and political contributions, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have long enjoyed a cozy relationship with Congress, and continue to draw its support. “What’s important are facts—and the facts are that Fannie and Freddie are in sound situation,” U.S. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., said on CNN Sunday evening before Treasury Secretary Paulson unveiled the credit line for the two lenders. “They have more than adequate capital. They’re in good shape,” Dodd continued.







