Innovative Curriculum Synthesizes Arts and Sciences
The New Humanities Initiative developed by Binghamton University presents a curriculum that combines the humanities and sciences.
30-Second Summary
The New Humanities Initiative, a program being developed by two professors at Binghamton University in New York state, would attempt to bridge the gap between science and the humanities across various disciplines, including history and business.
The proposal comes 50 years after English physicist and novelist C.P. Snow presented a lecture called “Two Cultures,” which confronted the hostile divide between scientists and literary scholars.
Some “believe that the cultural chasm can be bridged and the sciences and humanities united into a powerful new discipline,” according to The New York Times. Others doubt the ability of either literature or science to survive on its own.
An article in the Boston Globe questioned whether the study of literature has become irrelevant over the past decade. The author believes that “literature professors should apply science’s research methods” and “embrace science’s spirit of intellectual optimism.”
The University of Pennsylvania examined the ability of scientists to articulate research in words. “If scientists have trouble explaining their work to nonscientists, how long will our society continue to support cutting-edge research—and what are the consequences?” asked the University.
Meanwhile, some institutions and educators have already been touting a more inclusive curriculum.
At a 2007 conference called “Promoting the Liberal Sciences: Science as Liberal Education,” university teachers and administrators discussed interdisciplinary approaches to teaching science, such as “studying biology through science fiction films.” Such programs have proven successful at Susquehanna University and Austin College.
The proposal comes 50 years after English physicist and novelist C.P. Snow presented a lecture called “Two Cultures,” which confronted the hostile divide between scientists and literary scholars.
Some “believe that the cultural chasm can be bridged and the sciences and humanities united into a powerful new discipline,” according to The New York Times. Others doubt the ability of either literature or science to survive on its own.
An article in the Boston Globe questioned whether the study of literature has become irrelevant over the past decade. The author believes that “literature professors should apply science’s research methods” and “embrace science’s spirit of intellectual optimism.”
The University of Pennsylvania examined the ability of scientists to articulate research in words. “If scientists have trouble explaining their work to nonscientists, how long will our society continue to support cutting-edge research—and what are the consequences?” asked the University.
Meanwhile, some institutions and educators have already been touting a more inclusive curriculum.
At a 2007 conference called “Promoting the Liberal Sciences: Science as Liberal Education,” university teachers and administrators discussed interdisciplinary approaches to teaching science, such as “studying biology through science fiction films.” Such programs have proven successful at Susquehanna University and Austin College.
Headline Links: A necessary marriage?
The New York Times reports on the New Humanities Initiative, a program being developed by two professors at Binghamton University in New York State. The program would bridge science and the humanities by presenting “basic scientific tools like statistics” and cornerstones of liberal arts, such as close analysis of different texts, in classes across various disciplines, including history and business.
Source: New York Times
An article in the Boston Globe questioned whether the study of literature has become irrelevant over the past decade. An increasing number of literary scholars “have agreed that the field has become moribund, aimless. … Class enrollments and funding are down, morale is sagging, huge numbers of PhDs can’t find jobs,” said the article. The author’s proposed solution is that “literary studies should become more like the sciences.”
Source: Boston.com
Background: Educators explore the link
In October 2007, online publication Inside Higher Ed reported on a conference called “Promoting the Liberal Sciences: Science as Liberal Education,” which brought together university teachers and administrators to discuss interdisciplinary approaches to teaching science, such as “studying biology through science fiction films.” Challenges faced by students and teachers attempting to bridge disciplines were discussed, along with successful university programs.
Source: Inside Higher Ed
In August 2006, European journal “Science in School” published an article by a chemistry teacher who investigated the links between science and the humanities. To do so, the teacher “used two Italian Renaissance paintings to delve into the chemistry of pigment extraction and the physics of forensics.”
Source: Science in School
Related Topics: The great divide
In 2005, U.K. newspaper The Daily Telegraph announced the launch of an award for young science writers. British scientist Martin Rees discussed the difficult task of putting scientific research into words. “Occasionally, great science has been fine literature as well,” he said, but more often, “the papers are addressed to fellow scientists; they typically have very few readers.”
Source: Daily Telegraph
In an interview conducted by the University of Pennsylvania, physicist David Balamuth discussed the problem of the split between the arts and humanities. “In any successful bargain, like the compact between scientists and society, each party must recognize the fundamental legitimacy of the other’s point of view,” said Balamuth.
Source: University of Pennsylvania
Opinion & Analysis: The decline of literary criticism
In The Nation, William Deresiewicz argues that graduate students of literature “are writing the same dissertations, with the same tools, as they were in 1990,” and choosing “more ‘practical’ majors like economics,” while universities shift focus to the sciences. The result is that the field of academic literature is “in a steep, prolonged and apparently irreversible decline.”
Source: The Nation
Reference: A collaborative alliance
HASTAC, the Humanities, Arts, Sciences and Technology Advanced Collaboratory, is an alliance of leaders in the humanities and sciences, including universities and museums, committed to innovative collaboration and “creative use of technology.” The group has resources for potential collaborators, supports events and provides fellowships related to the blending of arts and sciences.









